Portfolio perspectives

Group of advisors in an office reviewing files

Portfolio perspectives

Expert Perspective

 | 

September 8, 2025

Each month, you'll have access to the latest insights from our Portfolio Solutions experts to help you address evolving issues that may affect your clients' portfolios. In this edition:

  • The uncertainty and cyclicality of returns of international equities combined with the potential benefits of diversification forms the main case for including them in an investment portfolio.
  • While international equities have experienced periods of outperforming U.S. stocks, it may be more useful to focus on their potential diversification benefits.

 

Natalie Romeo portrait
Natalie Marvi-Romeo, CFA, CAIA®
Vanguard Portfolio Solutions
Natalie Romeo portrait

Natalie Marvi-Romeo, CFA, CAIA®

Vanguard Portfolio Solutions

Portrait of Chris Tidmore
Chris Tidmore, CFA
Senior Manager, Investment Advisory Research Center
Portrait of Chris Tidmore

Chris Tidmore

Senior Manager, Investment Advisory Research Center

Portrait for Edward Dinucci
Ted Dinucci, CFA
Senior Research Specialist, Investment Advisory Research Center
Portrait for Edward Dinucci

Ted Dinucci, CFA

Senior Research Specialist, Investment Advisory Research Center

International equities: Will the performance continue?

In a Portfolio perspectives piece earlier this year, we acknowledged advisors’ frustrations with international equity performance over the past 15 years. We made the case that the uncertainty and cyclicality of returns of international stocks relative to U.S. stocks is the first rationale for the inclusion of international stocks in a U.S. investor’s portfolio. The uncertainty, combined with the potential benefits of diversification, forms the most compelling argument for including international equities in an investment portfolio.

When international equities began to outperform U.S. equities in February of this year, the tenor of our conversations with advisors shifted from whether to allocate to international equity at all to “what is an appropriate allocation?” and its frequently asked corollary, “will outperformance versus the U.S. persist?”

The exact allocation to U.S. and non-U.S. stocks is less important than having a reasonable allocation to both.

Historically, the inclusion of international equities has reduced the volatility of the equity allocation within a portfolio. Figure 1 indicates that the optimal diversification may be achieved with a 40% allocation to international equities. However, most of the reduction in portfolio volatility occurs with the first 20% to 30%, with diminishing per-unit benefits thereafter.

 

Figure 1: International diversification has reduced portfolio volatility through time

Change in annualized volatility when including international stocks in a U.S. equity portfolio (1970–2024)

A line chart shows how annualized volatility changes as international stocks are added to a portfolio that's originally all U.S. equity. As the allocation of international equity reaches 40%, the change in portfolio volatility reaches its lowest (-0.79%) The period shown combines all results from 1970 to 2024. At higher international equity allocations, the change in portfolio volatility goes back in the opposite direction, with 1.2% change at 100% allocation to international equity.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

Notes: Non-U.S. equities represented by MSCI World Index ex USA from 1970 through June 1994 and MSCI All Country World Index ex USA thereafter. U.S. stocks are represented by the FT Wilshire 5000 Index from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI USA Investable Market Index from July 1994 through June 2001, and CRSP US Total Market Index thereafter. When determining which index to use and for what period, we selected the index that we deemed to fairly represent the characteristics of the referenced market, given the available choices.

Sources: Investment Advisory Research Center calculations using data from MSCI and Morningstar Direct. Data as of December 31, 2024.

However, it's important to note that most assets and sub-asset classes will experience significant periods of underperformance. This may require advisors to defend the rationale for these investments, focusing on uncertainty of future returns and the potential benefits of diversification. There will be days, months, even years where one investment outperforms the other, and the question will linger—will its current outperformance persist?

It's worth remembering that U.S. equity hasn’t always been in the lead. It seems like a distant memory, but the lost decade of the 2000s (bookended by the tech crash and global financial crisis) saw the S&P 500 Index return −1% on an annualized basis, versus 3% for the MSCI ACWI ex-US.

This year, we’ve seen international equities outperform from the end of 2024 through the middle of May by around 15%.1 Many advisors asked if we should expect that outperformance to continue. Over the last couple months, there has been a small reversal, but we can see in Figure 2 that historically, when one category has outperformed over the course of a year, that outperformance tends to persist.

 

Figure 2: International equity has historically continued relative outperformance to U.S. equities after periods of significant outperformance

Subsequent international equity relative performance after periods of out and underperformance (1970–July 2025)

A series of bar charts show how, historically, international equity has shown sustained outperformance versus U.S. equities, after international has had periods of significant outperformance. The bar charts also demonstrated the reciprocal, historically: after periods of underperformance versus U.S. equities, international stocks have shown a tendency to continue underperforming in the immediately ensuing years. The period covered is from 1970 through July 2025.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

Notes: International equity: MSCI World ex USA Index (USD) from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI All-Country World ex USA Investable Market Index (USD) thereafter. US equity: S&P 500 Index from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI USA Investable Market Index from July 1994 through June 2001, CRSP U.S. Total Market Index thereafter.

Source: Vanguard Investment Advisory Research Center analysis using data from Morningstar Direct as of July 31, 2025.

While this analysis offers some basis for expecting international to outperform U.S. in subsequent periods—as might looking at current relative valuations—predicting the best-performing market remains challenging. It may prove more productive to focus on the potential benefits of diversification, one of Vanguard’s foundational principles for investment success.  An additional potential benefit of a global allocation is an exposure to a different mix of industries, companies, and currencies than a U.S. equity-only portfolio. Vanguard’s report, Not all great stocks are found in the U.S. markets, addresses the different company exposures that international equities offer, and it can be shared with your clients.

Next steps to consider: Does your international allocation meet your overall portfolio objectives?

  • Is low-cost beta a core objective of your portfolio? If so, consider these options:
    • A broadly diversified index fund or ETF such as Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS).
    • For those clients whose risk tolerance does not extend to emerging markets or when you want to control their emerging markets exposure, a developed markets fund or ETF such as Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) alone or paired with Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO).
  • Is income an overarching objective?
    • Consider the premium dividend yield of international stocks such as the index used by Vanguard International High Dividend Yield (VYMI).
  • Is quality a focus?
    • Consider the defensive properties of a dividend growth index such as the S&P Global Ex-U.S. Dividend Growers Index, used by Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIGI).
  • Is active management a preference for targeting international exposure?
    • Vanguard partners with some of the most experienced investment managers in the world as subadvisors on our active funds. For instance, the Wellington-managed “all weather” International Core Stock Fund, VZICX, incorporates a multi-disciplinary approach that leverages the strengths of an extended investment team.

Partner with Vanguard Portfolio Solutions

Want more detailed insight on fine tuning international exposure for your client portfolios? Connect with our Portfolio Solutions team to review your international allocations and optimize them for your clients’ needs!

1 Investment Advisory Research Center analysis, based on CRSP US Total Market Index and MSCI All Country World Index ex-USA.

More Vanguard analysis

For additional expert insights, check out:

  • Advisor Trends: Find out how your portfolios stack up in comparison with your advisor peers'.
  • Market perspectives: Turn to Vanguard's senior economists each month for projected returns and monthly economic highlights on inflation, growth, and expected Fed actions.
  • Active Fixed Income Perspectives: View our quarterly, in-depth commentary for a sector-by-sector analysis and a summary of how those views affect the Vanguard active bond funds.
  • ETF perspectives: Get the latest ETF trends and insights from our investment experts to help you address issues that may affect your clients' portfolios.

Notes:

  • For more information about Vanguard funds or Vanguard ETFs, view detailed product information or call 800-997-2798 to obtain a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus. Investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other important information are contained in the prospectus; read and consider it carefully before investing.
  • Vanguard ETF Shares are not redeemable with the issuing Fund other than in very large aggregations worth millions of dollars. Instead, investors must buy and sell Vanguard ETF Shares in the secondary market and hold those shares in a brokerage account. In doing so, the investor may incur brokerage commissions and may pay more than net asset value when buying and receive less than net asset value when selling.
  • All investing is subject to risk, including possible loss of principal. Be aware that fluctuations in the financial markets and other factors may cause declines in the value of your account. There is no guarantee that any particular asset allocation or mix of funds will meet your investment objectives or provide you with a given level of income.
  • Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.
  • Investments in stocks or bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country/regional risk, which is the chance that political upheaval, financial troubles, or natural disasters will adversely affect the value of securities issues by companies in foreign countries or regions; and currency risk, which is the chance that the value of a foreign investment, measured in U.S. dollars, will decrease because of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.
  • Stocks or bonds of companies based in emerging markets are subject to national and regional political and economic risks and to the risk of currency fluctuations. These risks are especially high in emerging markets.
  • CFA® is a registered trademark owned by the CFA Institute.