Portfolio perspectives
Expert Perspective
|September 8, 2025
Expert Perspective
|September 8, 2025
Each month, you'll have access to the latest insights from our Portfolio Solutions experts to help you address evolving issues that may affect your clients' portfolios. In this edition:
Vanguard Portfolio Solutions
Senior Manager, Investment Advisory Research Center
Senior Research Specialist, Investment Advisory Research Center
In a Portfolio perspectives piece earlier this year, we acknowledged advisors’ frustrations with international equity performance over the past 15 years. We made the case that the uncertainty and cyclicality of returns of international stocks relative to U.S. stocks is the first rationale for the inclusion of international stocks in a U.S. investor’s portfolio. The uncertainty, combined with the potential benefits of diversification, forms the most compelling argument for including international equities in an investment portfolio.
When international equities began to outperform U.S. equities in February of this year, the tenor of our conversations with advisors shifted from whether to allocate to international equity at all to “what is an appropriate allocation?” and its frequently asked corollary, “will outperformance versus the U.S. persist?”
The exact allocation to U.S. and non-U.S. stocks is less important than having a reasonable allocation to both.
Historically, the inclusion of international equities has reduced the volatility of the equity allocation within a portfolio. Figure 1 indicates that the optimal diversification may be achieved with a 40% allocation to international equities. However, most of the reduction in portfolio volatility occurs with the first 20% to 30%, with diminishing per-unit benefits thereafter.
Change in annualized volatility when including international stocks in a U.S. equity portfolio (1970–2024)
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.
Notes: Non-U.S. equities represented by MSCI World Index ex USA from 1970 through June 1994 and MSCI All Country World Index ex USA thereafter. U.S. stocks are represented by the FT Wilshire 5000 Index from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI USA Investable Market Index from July 1994 through June 2001, and CRSP US Total Market Index thereafter. When determining which index to use and for what period, we selected the index that we deemed to fairly represent the characteristics of the referenced market, given the available choices.
Sources: Investment Advisory Research Center calculations using data from MSCI and Morningstar Direct. Data as of December 31, 2024.
However, it's important to note that most assets and sub-asset classes will experience significant periods of underperformance. This may require advisors to defend the rationale for these investments, focusing on uncertainty of future returns and the potential benefits of diversification. There will be days, months, even years where one investment outperforms the other, and the question will linger—will its current outperformance persist?
It's worth remembering that U.S. equity hasn’t always been in the lead. It seems like a distant memory, but the lost decade of the 2000s (bookended by the tech crash and global financial crisis) saw the S&P 500 Index return −1% on an annualized basis, versus 3% for the MSCI ACWI ex-US.
This year, we’ve seen international equities outperform from the end of 2024 through the middle of May by around 15%.1 Many advisors asked if we should expect that outperformance to continue. Over the last couple months, there has been a small reversal, but we can see in Figure 2 that historically, when one category has outperformed over the course of a year, that outperformance tends to persist.
Subsequent international equity relative performance after periods of out and underperformance (1970–July 2025)
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.
Notes: International equity: MSCI World ex USA Index (USD) from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI All-Country World ex USA Investable Market Index (USD) thereafter. US equity: S&P 500 Index from 1970 through June 1994, MSCI USA Investable Market Index from July 1994 through June 2001, CRSP U.S. Total Market Index thereafter.
Source: Vanguard Investment Advisory Research Center analysis using data from Morningstar Direct as of July 31, 2025.
While this analysis offers some basis for expecting international to outperform U.S. in subsequent periods—as might looking at current relative valuations—predicting the best-performing market remains challenging. It may prove more productive to focus on the potential benefits of diversification, one of Vanguard’s foundational principles for investment success. An additional potential benefit of a global allocation is an exposure to a different mix of industries, companies, and currencies than a U.S. equity-only portfolio. Vanguard’s report, Not all great stocks are found in the U.S. markets, addresses the different company exposures that international equities offer, and it can be shared with your clients.
Want more detailed insight on fine tuning international exposure for your client portfolios? Connect with our Portfolio Solutions team to review your international allocations and optimize them for your clients’ needs!
1 Investment Advisory Research Center analysis, based on CRSP US Total Market Index and MSCI All Country World Index ex-USA.
More Vanguard analysis
For additional expert insights, check out:
Notes: