ETF Industry Perspectives Q1 2026

ETF Industry Perspectives 1Q 2026

Expert Perspective

 | 

February 10, 2026

Vanguard ETF industry perspectives is our quarterly in-depth commentary with analysis of key trends and how they’re affecting ETF investors.

 

Portrait of Brad Collins
Brad Collins, CFA
Fixed Income Investment Product Management Senior Specialist
Portrait of Brad Collins

Brad Collins, CFA

Fixed Income Investment Product Management Senior Specialist

Portrait of Andrey Kotlyarenko
Andrey Kotlyarenko, CFA
Equity Index Senior Investment Product Manager
Portrait of Andrey Kotlyarenko

Andrey Kotlyarenko, CFA

Equity Index Senior Investment Product Manager

Portrait of David Sharp
David Sharp
Director, ETF Capital Markets
Portrait of David Sharp

David Sharp

Director, ETF Capital Markets

 

Key highlights

 

Fixed income spotlight: Last year was strong for fixed income markets, with the broad U.S. bond market posting a 7.5% total return. Bond yields remain near decade highs, and we believe that it’s time for advisors to rethink client allocations to bonds. At the core of this insight is that more than half of total returns from the bond market were derived from income returns in 2025. And the Vanguard Economic and Market Outlook for 2026 suggests that attractive bond yields are likely to be here for a while.

Equity spotlight: About 40% of all ETF flows went to Standard & Poor’s 500 Index strategies in 2025. Advisors are facing the possibility of client portfolios being overallocated to large-cap tech and tech-related stocks that compose about one-third of the index’s market capitalization. Some advisors have begun to address the S&P 500’s expanding large-cap bias by tilting client portfolios toward small- and mid-cap stocks. Another option is to lean into the S&P Completion Index, which would provide greater exposure to mid-, small-, and micro-cap stocks and introduce a value tilt. 

Bonds are back—particularly the “income” part of fixed income

For investors, 2022 was painful. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by more than 500 basis points to control inflation, causing both stock and bond prices to plunge.1 Bond prices, in particular, fell to an extent not experienced in 40 years.

But the pain of 2022 was required to end a lost decade-plus in fixed income and restore the role of bonds in portfolios, ushering in a new era. We believe it’s time for advisors to rethink their client allocations to bonds. After all, 2022 was truly an outlier for bond market returns, as the Figure 1a chart below shows.

With yields now near their highest levels since before the global financial crisis and yield curves normalizing, it’s probably time for investors to confront their bad memories of 2022 and give bonds the fresh look they deserve. The Vanguard Economic and Market Outlook for 2026 suggests that attractive bond yields will be here for a while, creating opportunities for advisors to add value by expanding client allocations to fixed income.2

Since the inception of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, income return has represented the vast majority of total return, as seen in the Figure 1b chart below.3 In 2025, when the broad U.S. bond market registered a 7.5% total return, most of that came from income.4

The past three years have been characterized by a return to normality. An easy way to appreciate the current bond market dynamics is that you’d have to go back to 2012 to find the last time annual income return was above 4% for broad fixed income markets.5

 

Income is driving relatively attractive bond returns

1a. Cumulative returns for the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index

An area chart shows price return and total return of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index from January 1990 through November 2025. Price returns are modest throughout the time period, while total returns climb steeply. The area between the two lines is shaded to reflect the impact of income return. Over time and including the effect of compounding, income makes up the vast majority of total returns.

Note: This chart shows price return and total return over time, with the latter including the income-return component that reflects ongoing compounding. 

Source: Bloomberg, from January 31, 1990, through November 28, 2025.

1b. Historical fixed income performance highlights the outlier status of 2022

A bar chart shows annual bond market returns from 1928 through 2025. With a return of around –13%, 2022 is a clear outlier from a historical perspective. The majority of years in the nearly 100-year period are clustered in a performance range between about 0% and 9%.

Notes: This chart shows the cumulative performance from January through December for each calendar year going back to 1928. The frequency refers to the number of individual years that are contained in a given bar, with the majority of years clustered in a performance range between about 0% and 9%. Data are through December 31, 2025.

Sources: Vanguard Investment Advisory Research Center analysis, using data from Morningstar, Inc., including the IA SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term Government Bond Index through 1972, Bloomberg Intermediate U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index from 1973 through 1975, and Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index thereafter.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

Fed rate cuts pose challenges but also point to opportunities

Since the federal funds rate peaked in the summer of 2023 at 5.25%–5.50%, the Federal Reserve has cut the policy rate by 175 basis points to between 3.50% and 3.75%.6

Investors scarred by the bond market disappointment of 2022 can’t be faulted much for clinging to the short end of the yield curve. Treasury bills outyielded the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index for nearly 20 months between March 2023 and December 2024, but that juicy yield has declined steadily since then.7

Many investors still have large allocations in money market funds or ultrashort bonds. But that trade is growing less rewarding with each Fed rate cut, forcing investors to ask themselves the question: What’s next?

With the Fed resuming rate cuts, it’s likely the time to explore the possibility of locking in higher yields by going further out on the yield curve. Specifically, investors should consider targeting a portfolio duration closer to that of a core bond portfolio (4–6 years). 

Furthermore, given high equity valuations and the uncertainty around the AI trade, owning high-quality fixed income could offer investors a true diversifier should there be a risk-off event in markets that causes equities to underperform. 

A key moment

The “income” in fixed income is calling for investors’ attention, and we believe now is the time for advisors to rethink their approach to fixed income in client portfolios. Initiating positions in the current environment can secure attractive yields for longer while improving portfolio diversification.

Finding ways to manage the growing top-heaviness of the S&P 500

As the U.S. equity market continues to climb on bullishness surrounding the integration of AI into the macroeconomy, concerns about overallocation to tech stocks also continue to preoccupy investors.

That’s partly because a high percentage of ETF inflows are going into S&P 500 Index strategies—including 41% of all ETF flows in 2025—as shown in the accompanying chart.8

Moreover, the S&P 500 is becoming increasingly top-heavy with high-flying tech and tech-related stocks that together composed about one-third of the index’s market capitalization as of December 2025.9

This top-heaviness has fueled concerns that, for equity investors, the S&P 500 itself is not enough to ensure proper diversification.

 

S&P 500 ETF inflows have constituted a high percentage of total U.S. equity inflows in recent years

A bar chart shows how in recent years, ETFs targeting the S&P 500 Index have composed a large percentage of total U.S. ETF inflows. Beginning in 2023, S&P 500 ETFs started garnering at least 40% of inflows each year, compared with about 4% in 2020, 30% in 2021, and 17% in 2022.

Note: The S&P 500 Index strategies include Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (SPY), and State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF (SPYM).

Source: Morningstar, Inc., from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2025.

Advisors pivoting

Our research has shown that advisors are already addressing concerns surrounding the top-heaviness of the S&P 500, which has tilted the index toward large-cap equities and an overweight to tech-sector holdings.

Many of the advisors we surveyed said that they’re underweighting large-cap stocks and tilting client portfolios toward small- and mid-cap stocks. Overall, around 75% of the portfolios in the survey were underweight large-cap, and about three-fourths were overweight small- and mid-cap.10

Broad index ETF solution

A size and sector tilt similar to the one that advisors are implementing can be achieved by leaning away from the S&P 500 and into the S&P Completion Index.

The S&P Completion Index includes individual names that aren’t part of the S&P 500, such as mid-, small-, and even micro-cap stocks that can help offset the S&P 500’s large-cap bias. Additionally, integrating the S&P Completion Index can bring a value tilt to a portfolio skewed to growth by large allocations to the S&P 500.11

The accompanying chart shows how sector allocations between the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Completion Index differ.

Using the S&P Completion Index could provide advisors with a relatively straightforward method to effectively manage asset allocations as the top-heaviness of the S&P 500 evolves in real time.

 

Comparing sector concentrations of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Completion Index

A bar chart shows how sector concentrations of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Completion Index differed as of November 2025, particularly regarding technology. Exposure to the technology sector was 43.2% for the S&P 500, compared with 18.68% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the consumer non-cyclicals sector was 9.36% for the S&P 500, compared with 4.2% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the utilities sector was 2.37% for the S&P 500, compared with 1.81% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the telecommunications sector was 0.99% for the S&P 500, compared with 0.94% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the business services sector was 1.78% for the S&P 500, compared with 2.15% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the energy sector was 2.81% for the S&P 500, compared with 3.83% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the consumer services sector was 2.42% for the S&P 500, compared with 4.13% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the consumer cyclicals sector was 4.1% for the S&P 500, compared with 6.36% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the healthcare sector was 9.59% for the S&P 500, compared with 13.97% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the non-energy materials sector was 2.03% for the S&P 500, compared with 7.13% for the S&P Completion. Exposure to the industrials sector was 7.06% for the S&P 500, compared with 14.35% for the S&P Completion. And exposure to the finance sector was 14.31% for the S&P 500, compared with 22.45% for the S&P Completion.

Source: FactSet, as of November 28, 2025.

PDF
ETF Industry Perspectives Q1 2026: Why bonds are back and how to manage large-cap equity tilts

A quarterly brochure on the U.S. ETF ecosystem, with information designed to give advisors tools to help clients.

1 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, using Federal Reserve Economic Data, from September 2021 through July 2023.

2 Vanguard research, as of December 10, 2025.

3 According to Bloomberg, the U.S. Universal index was created on January 1, 1999, with the index history backfilled to January 1, 1990.

4 Bloomberg, using the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, as of December 31, 2025.

5 Bloomberg, using the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, from July 2012 through November 2025.

6 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, using Federal Reserve Economic Data, from June 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025.

7 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, using Federal Reserve Economic Data, from March 2023 through December 2025.

8 Morningstar, Inc., as of December 31, 2025. The S&P 500 Index strategies include Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (SPY), and State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF (SPYM).

9 FactSet, as of December 31, 2025. The so-called “Magnificent Seven” stocks composing approximately one-third of the S&P 500 Index’s market capitalization include Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla.

10 Vanguard Portfolio Analytics and Consulting research, as of June 30, 2025.

11 Morningstar, Inc., as of November 28, 2025.

 

Important information

For more information about Vanguard funds or Vanguard ETFs, visit advisors.vanguard.com or call 800-997-2798 to obtain a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus. Investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other important information about a fund are contained in the prospectus; read and consider it carefully before investing.

Vanguard ETF Shares are not redeemable with the issuing Fund other than in very large aggregations worth millions of dollars. Instead, investors must buy and sell Vanguard ETF Shares in the secondary market and hold those shares in a brokerage account. In doing so, the investor may incur brokerage commissions and may pay more than net asset value when buying and receive less than net asset value when selling.

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. There is no guarantee that any particular asset allocation or mix of funds will meet your investment objectives or provide you with a given level of income. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Investments in bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, and inflation risk.

Bond funds are subject to the risk that an issuer will fail to make payments on time, and that bond prices will decline because of rising interest rates or negative perceptions of an issuer’s ability to make payments.

Prices of mid- and small-cap stocks often fluctuate more than those of large-company stocks.

S&P® and S&P 500® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and its affiliates and sublicensed for certain purposes by Vanguard. The S&P Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and has been licensed for use by Vanguard. The Vanguard Fund(s) is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P or their respective affiliates, and none of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P nor their respective affiliates makes any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s).

CFA® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.

© 2026 The Vanguard Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor of the Funds.