2024 strong equity returns: From caution to celebration to rebalancing into fixed income

Some alt text

2024 strong equity returns: From caution to celebration to rebalancing into fixed income

Expert Perspective

 | 

December 30, 2024

  • The equity market did well in 2024, setting new highs and delivering strong returns. This shows the importance of sticking to your investment plan and ignoring market noise.
  • As we head into 2025, it's important to review your portfolio with your advisor and consider rebalancing into bonds. This can help manage risks and improve long-term returns.
  • While U.S. equity markets did well, non-U.S. markets and bonds had lower returns. A balanced portfolio, which includes both stocks and bonds, can help smooth out these differences.
  • Despite the strong performance of equities, many investors stayed disciplined and rebalanced their portfolios. This means they sold some stocks and bought more bonds to keep their investment mix at their desired allocations.

Tip: Select Copy to clipboard to copy the full summary and paste it to share or save for later.

As we reflect on the investment returns for 2024, it’s clear that the year provided strong returns for diversified, balanced investors who were able to tune out the noise. At the start of the year, it would have been easy for advisors to justify lowering their equity allocations, especially to U.S. equities, stocks in the Magnificent 8 (Mag 8),1 and/or large-cap growth stocks amidst low U.S. equity market predictions, high relative valuations, and higher bond yields. These conditions led analysts and financial experts alike to sound a cautionary tale, with headlines from major financial publications echoing this sentiment:

  • Bloomberg: "2024 Market Outlook: Caution Prevails Amid Uncertainty."
  • The Wall Street Journal: "S&P 500 Faces Headwinds in 2024."
  • CNBC: "Economic Indicators Suggest a Rocky Start to 2024 for Investors."

Despite the initial concerns and negative sentiment surrounding the U.S. equity markets, the market defied expectations, setting new all-time highs on 57 different days—ranking as the fifth most in history. This performance is on track to deliver an annual return of approximately 24% as of December 27 (Figure 1a). The incredibly strong equity returns, especially in the face of such dire predictions early in the year, underscore the importance of ignoring market noise and sticking to your investment plan. As Vanguard founder Jack C. Bogle famously advised, “press on regardless and stay the course!”

This year’s strong U.S. equity returns follow the robust performance of U.S. equities in 2023, resulting in two consecutive years with returns exceeding 20%. In fact, the U.S. equity market has provided returns exceeding 20% in five of the last six years, with the exception being 2022, when it was down 19%. As we continue to observe, equity returns are rarely as expected and seldom near their long-term averages. Instead, they exhibit a wide distribution, making the ability to tune out the noise a true superpower for investing success.

While U.S. equity markets produced strong returns, non-U.S. equity markets continued to underperform, with the total international equity market as of December 27 up approximately 5%. U.S. bond markets, as measured by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, had a positive yet more muted return of approximately 1% (Figure 1b). Balanced allocations, such as a 60% U.S. stock /40% U.S. bond portfolio, provided a return of approximately 14% (Figure 1c). The strong performance of both U.S. equity and balanced portfolios in 2024 once again highlights the importance of tuning out the noise and maintaining a long-term investment strategy. 

 

Figure 1a. Distribution of annual stock returns from 1928 to 2024

The image shows three a histograms of annual performance for stocks, bonds, and a 60% stock/40% bond portfolio from 1928 to 2024. Figure 1a illustrates the distribution of annual stock performance. •	The x-axis shows calendar-year performance bins, ranging from losses greater than 40% to gains greater than 40%. •	The y-axis represents the frequency of years that fall within each performance bin. •	An arrow points to the 2022 performance, which falls within the 19% negative return category. •	Orange and cyan bars highlight the years 2024, 2023, 2021, and 2020, indicating relatively stronger recent performance. In summary, the histograms offer a clear visual depiction of the performance distribution over time for stocks, bonds, and a 60-40 portfolio, emphasizing the recent years' strong relative performance.

Figure 1b. Distribution of annual bond returns from 1928 to 2024

Figure 1b illustrates the distribution of annual bond performance. •	Figure 1b presents the distribution of annual bond performance. •	An arrow highlights the 2022 performance, which falls within the -13% return range. •	Another arrow highlights 2024, a positive year close to its central tendency. •	The orange bars for 2020 and 2023 show that the bond market performed well in those years.

Figure 1c. Distribution of annual 60% stock and 40% bond returns from 1928 to 2024

Figure 1c illustrates the distribution of annual 60-40 portfolio performance. •	This chart is similar to the first two but shows the distribution of annual returns for a 60% allocation to stocks and 40% to bonds. •	An arrow shows 2022 performance, which was in the -16% return range. •	The bars for 2020 and 2024 show that this portfolio type has had strong performance in those years.

Notes: Figures 1a. through 1c. show the cumulative performance from January through December each calendar year going back to 1928. Data for 2024 performance is through December20, 2024. 

Sources: Investment Advisory Research Center analysis using data from Morningstar, Inc. Figures 1a. through 1c.: Stocks: S&P 90 Index from 1928 through March 3, 1957; S&P 500 Index from March 4, 1957, through 1970; Wilshire 5000 from 1971 through April 22, 2005; MSCI US Broad Market Index from April 23, 2005, through June 2, 2013; and CRSP US Total Market Index thereafter.  Bonds: IA SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term Government Bond Index from 1928 through 1972; Bloomberg U.S. Government/Credit Intermediate-Term Index from 1973 through 1975; and Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index thereafter. 60-40: Simulated portfolio with 60% allocated to stocks and 40% allocated to bonds.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

In investing, it’s common to hear warnings of bubbles and impending bear markets. In our prior market commentaries, we sought to raise advisor awareness of this through our Three B Mental Model, as some businesses are incentivized to grab your attention by capitalizing on known investor fears and loss-aversion tendencies. Together, these can lead to short-term actions that go against long-term objectives.

Headlines over the past decade have repeatedly suggested that the Mag 8—and large-cap growth stocks more broadly—are overvalued (or even a bubble) and likely due for a pullback. As a result, the temptation to underweight these companies has been high, which is understandable given their relative valuations. But it is important to remember that the markets are forward-looking and that securities trade in deep auction markets dominated by large, sophisticated investors who incorporate all relevant factors into their price discovery process, not just relative valuations. Once again, the markets proved to be more accurate in predicting the future compared with the headlines and commonly used indicators.

While outperforming the markets is certainly possible, it's far more challenging than most believe. For example, as shown in Figure 2, despite the overwhelming negative sentiment for U.S. large-cap growth stocks, they have continued to outperform the other major public asset classes, not only in 2024 but also over the past three, five, and 10 years. Missing out on these exponentially higher returns—entirely or in part—would have materially harmed client and practice outcomes. Figure 2 also highlights the wide dispersion in returns among sub-asset classes and how the balanced category has returns closer to the center of the return distribution range, as expected and by design, reinforcing the importance of broad diversification.

 

Figure 2. Trailing market returns for selected indexes 

The table below shows the investment returns for various asset classes over different time periods. Specifically, the table is organized as follows:  •	Columns: Represent different investment periods: Year-to-date, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year. •	Rows: List different asset classes: Large Growth, Mid Growth, Small Growth, Large Value, Mid Value, Small Value, Balanced (60/40), Emerging Markets Equity, International Developed Equity, International Bonds (USD Hedged), and U.S. Bonds. •	Cells: Each cell shows the investment return for a specific asset class over the given time period. Returns are presented in two ways:  o	Annualized: The average yearly return over the period. o	Cumulative: This is the total return over the specified time period. The data source is Morningstar, Inc. The indexes used for each asset class are: Large Growth: CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index; Large Value: CRSP US Large Cap Value Index; Mid Growth: CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index; Mid Value: CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index; Small Growth: CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index; Small Value: CRSP US Small Cap Value Index; International Developed Equity: MSCI World ex USA Index (in USD); Emerging Markets Equity: MSCI Emerging Markets Index (in USD); U.S. Bonds: Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index (Float Adjusted); International Bonds (USD Hedged): Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD Index (USD Hedged); and Balanced (60/40): 36% CRSP US Total Stock Market Index, 24% MSCI All Country World Index IMI (in USD), 28% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Float Adjusted), and 12% Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD Index (USD Hedged).  In summary, the table offers a clear depiction of the benefits of diversification. Despite wide and oscillating returns of various asset classes, the balanced portfolio places in the middle over both short- and long-term periods.

Sources: Investment Advisory Research Center analysis using data from Morningstar, Inc. Large Growth: CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index; Large Value: CRSP US Large Cap Value Index; Mid Growth: CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index; Mid Value: CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index; Small Growth: CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index; Small Value: CRSP US Small Cap Value Index; International Developed Equity: MSCI World ex USA Index (in USD); Emerging Market Equity: MSCI Emerging Markets Index (in USD); U.S. Bonds: Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index (Float Adjusted); International Bonds (USD Hedged.): Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD Index (USD Hedged); Balanced (60/40): 36% CRSP US Total Stock Market Index, 24% MSCI All Country World Index IMI (in USD), 28% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Float Adjusted), and 12% Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD Index (USD Hedged).

Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

Advisors have successfully helped clients “stay the course”

Despite very strong, almost historic relative outperformance of equities to bonds over the last one, three, five, and 10 years, Vanguard’s Risk Appetite Speedometers show that equity allocations have not substantially drifted up (as has commonly occurred in the past) but have largely stayed the course as seen in Figure 4. Our research, which analyzes mutual fund and ETF cash flows within the context of relative investment performance and aggregate industry asset allocations, reveals that fund allocators remained disciplined and, for the most part, rebalanced their portfolios. This behavior is notably different from previous long and strong equity bull markets and aligns with our Advisor's Alpha® research.

For example, U.S. equity market returns exceeded 20% in each year from 1995 to 1999 and the aggregate industry equity allocation drifted from 38% at the beginning of 1995 to 64% by the end of 1999 (Figure 4). If investors and their advisors were rebalancing during this period, you would expect to see materially more cash flow into fixed income.

2024 saw unprecedented cash flows into fixed income

While 1999 and 2024 share similar U.S. equity market returns when compared with bonds, the relative cash flows during each period were materially different (Figure 3). In 1999 and the years leading up to it, cash flows into equities and fixed income were relatively balanced, as indicated by a fixed income-to-equity ratio of approximately 1X. However, in 2024 and the preceding years, there has been an unprecedented shift, with cash flows into fixed income ranging from five to 17 times those into equities. This type of contrarian, rebalancing cash flow is remarkably different from the past when cash flows largely followed performance. This trend is a promising sign that we've been monitoring, indicating that allocators and investors are making decisions that are truly in their best interests.

 

Figure 3. Equity and fixed income cash flows2 in billions ($) as of

  Equity Fixed income Fixed income to equity
11/30/2024
1-year $169.50 $936.50 5.5X
3-year $174.70 $2,022.00 11.6X
5-year $228.60 $3,996.30 17.5X
12/31/1999
1-year $164.40 $204.40 1.2X
3-year $509.50 $529.40 1.0X
5-year $811.30 $632.80 0.8X

Source: Vanguard Investment Advisory Research Center calculations using data provided by Morningstar, Inc., as of November 30, 2024.

 

Despite good rebalancing behavior, there is still work to be done!

Despite the strong rebalancing efforts by advisors during the most recent cycle, equity returns have been so strong relative to those of fixed income that there is likely more work to be done. As of November 30, 2024, equity allocations are near their peak levels, as seen in Figure 4.  As a result, for many clients, additional rebalancing from equities into fixed income may be needed in 2025. Following such periods of strong equity outperformance, it can be difficult—even counterintuitive—to sell equities and rebalance into fixed income. Additionally, rebalancing often carries another headwind as it may trigger capital gains taxes for some clients. In such cases, the tax impact can be managed through strategies such as tax-loss harvesting, where losses from other investments are used to offset gains. 

 

Figure 4: Aggregate industry asset allocations from January 1993 to November 30, 2024

The image is an area chart that shows the historical allocation of assets among three major asset classes: Equity (U.S., International, and Emerging Markets), Bond (Taxable and Muni), and Money Market. The time period is 1993 through November 2024. As of November 2024, equity accounted for 62.6%, bonds accounted for 18.8%, and money markets accounted for 18.6%. White line to visualize the variance among allocations. Data table: A table below the chart provides additional information about each asset class: Max: The maximum allocation percentage reached during the period.  Min: The minimum allocation percentage during the period. Median: The median allocation percentage.  In summary, this figure shows that while equity allocations have been trending upward, the variability in allocations has been relatively stable over the past 10 years, which suggests positive rebalancing behavior by mutual fund and ETF holders.

Sources: Vanguard Investment Advisory Research Center calculations using data from Morningstar.

Note: Black line illustrates current equity allocation (62.6% as of November 30, 2024) to visualize the variance of equity allocations (dark green area) through time.

2025 and beyond

As we enter 2025 and you prepare for annual reviews with clients, the market returns of 2024—and even those of the last five years—present you with an excellent opportunity to reinforce the value of “tuning out the noise and staying the course” as well as to assess whether your clients' portfolios require rebalancing from equities into fixed income. By leveraging history as a guide, you can remind clients that staying the course—which includes rebalancing—has historically served to mitigate risk and improve long-term returns.

For clients, higher and less variability in wealth—which comes from staying invested and not trying to time markets—increases their chances of financial success. For advisors, by practicing holistic wealth management and financial planning, you help to remove some of the uncertainty from the financial planning process and that will likely result in happier clients. And satisfied clients are more likely to make referrals to friends and family for a partner they trust and one who has served them well.

We are here to support you in these conversations: You can review our Behavioral Coaching Toolkit and Advisor's Alpha hub resources, or reach out to our sales teams for further assistance. Using these resources and insights, you are better equipped to have conversations that emphasize the tangible value you provide while also deepening the client relationship. By doing so, both your clients and your practice have the best chance for long-term success!

Notes:

1 The term Magnificent 7 (Mag 7) was coined in 2023 and includes: Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Meta (Facebook), Nvidia, and Tesla. The Magnificent 8 adds Netflix.

2 Note that 40 Act mutual funds and ETFs are not a closed system. Cash flows can come from other structures, platforms, and sources such as bank deposits, SMA’s, direct pension and sovereign wealth funds, among others.

All investing is subject to risk, including possible loss of principal.

Be aware that fluctuations in the financial markets and other factors may cause declines in the value of your account. There is no guarantee that any particular asset allocation or mix of funds will meet your investment objectives or provide you with a given level of income. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.

Bond funds are subject to the risk that an issuer will fail to make payments on time, and that bond prices will decline because of rising interest rates or negative perceptions of an issuer's ability to make payments.

Investments in stocks or bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country/regional risk and currency risk. These risks are especially high in emerging markets. 

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

CFA® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.

This article is listed under